Factors associated with poor academic achievement among urban primary school children in Malaysia

Singapore Med J. 2010 Mar;51(3):247-52.

Abstract

Introduction: The aim of this study was to identify factors associated with poor academic achievement during the early school years.

Methods: This was a cross-sectional study of urban Primary Two children. Sociodemographic and medical data were obtained from questionnaires and interviews. Achievement was based on marks obtained in the core subjects of the Primary One examination. All students underwent the Raven's Standard Progressive Matrices test as a general measure of cognitive ability, audiometry and visual tests, and standardised measurements of weight and height.

Results: Out of 1,470 eligible children, 206 (14 percent) had poor academic achievement. Of the 919 children who participated in the study, 111 (12.1 percent) had poor achievement compared with 95 (17.2 percent) of the 551 non-participants. Using logistic regression analysis, the factors that were found to be independently associated with poor academic achievement were lower mean Raven scores (p-value is less than 0.001), lower mean socioeconomic status scores (p-value is less than 0.001), larger sibship size (p-value is 0.031), male gender (odds ratio [OR] 1.7; 95 percent confidence interval [CI] 1.1-2.65) and a history of prematurity (OR 14; 95 percent CI 2-97.8).

Conclusion: Cognitive ability, gender, prematurity and social factors contribute to poor academic achievement during the early school years. The higher proportion of poor achievers among non-participants warrants further attention.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Audiometry
  • Child
  • Child Welfare
  • Cognition
  • Confidence Intervals
  • Cross-Sectional Studies
  • Educational Measurement*
  • Educational Status
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Intelligence Tests
  • Logistic Models
  • Malaysia
  • Male
  • Odds Ratio
  • Regression Analysis
  • Risk Factors
  • Schools*
  • Sex Factors
  • Socioeconomic Factors
  • Students*
  • Surveys and Questionnaires
  • Urban Population
  • Vision Tests