Background: In the era of fibrinolysis, women suffered from higher early and late mortality rates than men after acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has been determined to be the most effective therapy strategy in STEMI. It is not clear if female gender is an independent predictor of a worse long-term prognosis among patients who were systematically treated with PCI. We, therefore, examined the effect of PCI on long-term outcome between women and men.
Methods: Between 1999 and 2001, 500 consecutive patients at the Wuppertal Heart Centre were treated with PCI after acute STEMI. A long-term follow-up (up to 7 years) was achieved in 97% of the patients.
Results: In comparison to men, women were 7 years older (65 +/- 12 vs. 58 +/- 11) and had significantly more diabetes mellitus. The time between onset of symptoms and intervention tended to be longer in women than men. There was no difference in 30-day mortality (8.9% vs. 6.6%), cardiac late mortality (3.6% vs. 3.2%), and long-term cardiac overall mortality up to 7 years (12.1% vs. 9.6%). Stepwise regression analysis did not identify female gender as an independent predictor of late mortality. The quality of life was comparable.
Conclusions: There was no gender-related difference in the long-term outcome if patients were sytematically treated with PCI in STEMI. PCI in STEMI has a long-lasting positive effect in women and should, therefore, be considered the treatment of choice for women with acute myocardial infarction.