Antitumor activity and pharmacokinetics of oral gimatecan on pediatric cancer xenografts

Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2010 Sep;66(4):635-41. doi: 10.1007/s00280-009-1201-8. Epub 2009 Dec 20.

Abstract

Purpose: This study compared the antitumor activity and the pharmacological profile of gimatecan given orally and irinotecan (CPT-11) on pediatric tumor xenografts.

Experimental design: Gimatecan was tested in two neuroblastoma cell lines (SK-N-DZ and SK-N-(BE)2c) and on TE-671 rhabdomyosarcoma cells using two different schedules. We characterized its pharmacokinetic profile in nude mice bearing human SK-N-DZ and TE-671 cell lines.

Results: Gimatecan appears to have high plasma disposition. The drug was present in plasma almost completely as the intact lactone form and showed substantial activity in all tumor models. Prolonged daily treatment with low doses of gimatecan produced significant tumor regression in all tumor xenografts.

Conclusion: The antitumor activity and the promising pharmacological profile indicate gimatecan as an excellent candidate for clinical treatment of pediatric tumors.

MeSH terms

  • Administration, Oral
  • Animals
  • Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic / pharmacokinetics*
  • Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic / pharmacology*
  • Area Under Curve
  • Camptothecin / analogs & derivatives*
  • Camptothecin / pharmacokinetics
  • Camptothecin / pharmacology
  • Cell Line, Tumor
  • Cell Proliferation / drug effects
  • Child
  • Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid
  • Half-Life
  • Humans
  • Irinotecan
  • Male
  • Mice
  • Mice, Nude
  • Neuroblastoma / drug therapy
  • Rhabdomyosarcoma / drug therapy
  • Tetrazolium Salts
  • Thiazoles
  • Xenograft Model Antitumor Assays

Substances

  • Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic
  • ST 1481
  • Tetrazolium Salts
  • Thiazoles
  • Irinotecan
  • thiazolyl blue
  • Camptothecin