Community response to environmental noise and the impact on cardiovascular risk score

Sci Total Environ. 2010 Feb 15;408(6):1264-70. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2009.12.033. Epub 2010 Jan 8.

Abstract

Objective: The objective of our study was to investigate and evaluate the relationship between road traffic noise and cardiovascular risk.

Methods: The study sample (n=659; 36.9% male, 63.1% female university students, mean age 22.83+/-1.58 years) included a group exposed to road traffic noise (n=280, L(eq,24h)=67+/-2dB(A)) and a control group (n=379, L(eq,24h)=58.7+/-6dB(A)). Subjective response was determined by a validated noise annoyance questionnaire. The ten year risk of developing a coronary heart disease event was quantified as an evaluation of cardiovascular risk (SCORE60, Framingham 10-year risk estimation and projection to the age of 60, relative risk SCORE chart).

Results: Cardiovascular risk scores were significantly higher in the exposed group based on the Framingham scores projected to the age of 60, SCORE60 (AOR=2.72 (95% CI=1.21-6.15)) and the relative risk SCORE chart (AOR=2.81 (1.46-5.41)).

Conclusions: These findings highlight the association between road traffic noise and cardiovascular risk.

Publication types

  • Controlled Clinical Trial
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Blood Pressure Determination
  • Coronary Disease / epidemiology*
  • Environmental Exposure / adverse effects*
  • Environmental Exposure / analysis
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Lipids / blood
  • Male
  • Noise, Transportation / adverse effects*
  • Public Opinion
  • Risk Assessment
  • Risk Factors
  • Surveys and Questionnaires
  • Young Adult

Substances

  • Lipids