Hereditary breast and ovarian cancer: referral source for genetic assessment and communication regarding assessment with nongenetic clinicians in the community setting

Genet Med. 2010 Jan;12(1):25-31. doi: 10.1097/GIM.0b013e3181c60955.

Abstract

Purpose: To examine referral source to cancer genetic services; communication of results of genetic evaluation to clinicians; role of clinicians in postcounseling management; and use of alternative information sources after cancer genetic risk assessment/counseling in the community setting.

Methods: Retrospective telephone survey.

Setting: A community/private hospital-based cancer genetic counseling service.

Patients: Women, at least 21 years of age, who had undergone cancer genetic counseling with (1) at least a 10% predicted likelihood of carrying a BRCA1/2 mutation or (2) a documented BRCA1/2 mutation.

Intervention: A 121-item telephone survey.

Main outcome measure: (1) initial referral source to cancer genetic services; (2) women's communication of results of cancer genetic assessment to primary and (nongenetic) specialist clinician(s); (3) education and support role played by subjects' physician(s); and (4) use of other hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) information resources.

Results: Of 225 women eligible for study, 69 (31%) completed the survey. Sixty-two percent were referred by their medical oncologist; 13% by their primary care physician, and fewer by their surgeon (6%) or gynecologist (4%). Results of the cancer genetic assessment were not shared with 19% of primary care clinicians, 26% of primary gynecologists, 12% of oncologists, and 36% of surgeons. Twenty-six percent of participants noted that their primary care clinician had not been involved in their HBOC-related, cancer prevention decisions, 16% had not included their gynecologist, 2% had not involved their oncologist, and 20% replied that their surgeon had not been involved in these decisions. Overall, clinicians were perceived as supportive when it came to a participants' information and decision support needs. One exception was that 21% of respondents reported the use by clinicians of medical terms, without definition. Over two-thirds had sought alternative "self-help" HBOC-related materials, most Internet based.

Conclusions: These results have implications for interdisciplinary communication and decision support for those with or at risk for HBOC, cared for in the community setting.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • BRCA1 Protein / genetics
  • BRCA2 Protein / genetics
  • Breast Neoplasms / epidemiology
  • Breast Neoplasms / genetics*
  • Community Health Services
  • Documentation
  • Educational Status
  • Female
  • Genetic Counseling
  • Genetic Predisposition to Disease
  • Health Surveys
  • Humans
  • Income
  • Middle Aged
  • Mutation
  • Ovarian Neoplasms / epidemiology
  • Ovarian Neoplasms / genetics*
  • Referral and Consultation*
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Telephone

Substances

  • BRCA1 Protein
  • BRCA2 Protein