No evidence for functional selectivity of proxyfan at the human histamine H3 receptor coupled to defined Gi/Go protein heterotrimers

J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2010 Mar;332(3):996-1005. doi: 10.1124/jpet.109.162339. Epub 2009 Dec 3.

Abstract

Numerous structurally diverse ligands were developed to target the human histamine H(3) receptor (hH(3)R), a presynaptic G(i)/G(o)-coupled auto- and heteroreceptor. Proxyfan was identified to be functionally selective, with different efficacies toward G(i)/G(o)-dependent hH(3)R signaling pathways. However, the underlying molecular mechanism of functional selectivity of proxyfan is still unclear. In the current study, we investigated the role of different Galpha(i/o) proteins in hH(3)R signaling, using a baculovirus/Sf9 cell expression system. We tested the hypothesis that ligand-specific coupling differences to defined G(i)/G(o)-heterotrimers are responsible for functional selectivity of proxyfan at hH(3)R. In Sf9 membranes, full-length hH(3)R (445 amino acids) was expressed in combination with an excess of different mammalian G proteins (Galpha(i1), Galpha(i2), Galpha(i3), or Galpha(o1) and beta(1)gamma(2) dimers, respectively). In addition, we constructed the fusion proteins hH(3)R-Galpha(i2) and hH(3)R-Galpha(o1) to ensure clearly defined receptor/G protein stoichiometries. Steady-state GTPase experiments were performed to directly measure the impact of each G protein on hH(3)R signal transduction. The hH(3)R coupled similarly to all G proteins. We also observed similar ligand-independent or constitutive activity. Proxyfan and various other imidazole-containing ligands, including full agonists, partial agonists, and inverse agonists, showed very similar pharmacological profiles not influenced by the type of G protein coexpressed. Selected ligands, examined in membranes expressing the fusion proteins hH(3)R-Galpha(i2) and hH(3)R-Galpha(o1) (plus beta(1)gamma(2) dimers), yielded very similar results. Collectively, our data indicate that hH(3)R couples similarly to different Galpha(i/o)-subunits and that ligand-specific active receptor conformations, resulting in G protein-coupling preferences, do not exist for proxyfan or other imidazole compounds investigated.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Animals
  • Cell Line
  • GTP-Binding Protein alpha Subunit, Gi2 / genetics
  • GTP-Binding Protein alpha Subunits, Gi-Go / genetics
  • GTP-Binding Protein alpha Subunits, Gi-Go / metabolism*
  • Histamine Agonists / pharmacology
  • Histamine Antagonists / pharmacology
  • Humans
  • Imidazoles / pharmacology*
  • Ligands
  • Protein Multimerization
  • Receptors, Histamine H3 / genetics
  • Receptors, Histamine H3 / metabolism*
  • Recombinant Fusion Proteins / genetics
  • Recombinant Fusion Proteins / metabolism

Substances

  • Histamine Agonists
  • Histamine Antagonists
  • Imidazoles
  • Ligands
  • Receptors, Histamine H3
  • Recombinant Fusion Proteins
  • proxyfan
  • GTP-Binding Protein alpha Subunit, Gi2
  • GTP-Binding Protein alpha Subunits, Gi-Go