Does magnetic resonance imaging accurately predict residual disease in breast cancer?

Am J Surg. 2009 Oct;198(4):547-52. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2009.04.008.

Abstract

Background: The accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in identifying residual disease after breast conservation therapy (BCT) is unclear.

Method: Review of an institutional database identified patients with positive or close (<or=2 mm) margins undergoing MRI before re-excision. Histopathologic correlation was performed.

Results: Forty-three women underwent MRI after BCT. MRI suggested residual disease in 29 patients, of whom 20 (69%) had residual carcinoma pathologically. Nine patients had false-positive MRI as seen by benign pathology findings. Fourteen MRIs indicated no residual disease, of which 6 had residual disease pathologically. The sensitivity and positive predictive value of MRI was 77% and 69%, respectively. MRI conducted within 28 days of the original surgery was 85% sensitive. MRI performed after 28 days was 69% sensitive.

Conclusions: MRI is able to detect residual disease among most patients undergoing re-excision. False-positive results may be caused by inflammatory processes that resemble residual disease.

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Breast Neoplasms / diagnosis*
  • Breast Neoplasms / surgery
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging*
  • Mastectomy, Segmental
  • Middle Aged
  • Neoplasm, Residual / diagnosis*
  • Predictive Value of Tests