Introduction: We previously reported a 30% rate of inadequate antibiotic therapy in a general hospital with optimal organization. This data led to implement a systematic weekly infectious diseases consultation. We report an evaluation of antibiotic combinations.
Patients and methods: The infectious diseases consultation was scheduled half-a-day per week. Antibiotic combinations were collected by the pharmacist via computerized prescriptions. Discussion with the managing physician was systematic in order to evaluate the adequacy of the treatment both in terms of diagnosis and therapy.
Results: For 9 months, 381 patients were prescribed 486 antibiotic combinations, among which 116 were evaluated. The infectious diseases specialist suggested a similar diagnosis in 71 antibiotic treatments (61%), the diagnosis appeared doubtful in 36 cases (31%), and a true diagnostic discordance was noted in nine cases. The discussion between specialist and managing physician suggested that the antibiotic combination was justified in 35%, of limited usefulness in 22%, and inadequate in 43% of the cases. There was a significant correlation between the result of the discussion and the accuracy of the antibiotic combination (p<0.001). Respiratory infections were the main reason for inadequate or limited usefulness of antibiotic combinations (30/49, 61%).
Conclusion: Computerized prescriptions allow the evaluation of antibiotic therapy even when the infectious diseases specialist intervention is short. The discussion with the managing physician on diagnosis and treatment appears to play a central role for a better use of antibiotherapy.