Correlation of computed tomography, gray scale ultrasonography, and radionuclide imaging of the liver in detecting space-occupying processes

Radiology. 1977 Aug;124(2):387-93. doi: 10.1148/124.2.387.

Abstract

The abilities of computed tomography (CT; scanning time=2.7 min), gray scale ultrasonography, and radionuclide imaging to detect and characterize space-occupying processes in the liver were compared. A numerical rating scale which emphasized detection abilities resulted in ultrasonography scoring 3.5 CT 3.2, and radionuclide imaging 2.9. CT resulted in no false positives and 6 false negatives, caused mainly by motion artifacts. The simplest technique, radionuclide imaging, also had the smallest number (2) of false negatives; it is therefore recommended as the screening procedure of choice. Sonography or CT should be done for those patients with a prior suspicious finding.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Carcinoma, Hepatocellular / diagnosis
  • Carcinoma, Hepatocellular / diagnostic imaging
  • Colonic Neoplasms / diagnosis
  • Colonic Neoplasms / diagnostic imaging
  • Cysts / diagnosis
  • Cysts / diagnostic imaging
  • False Negative Reactions
  • False Positive Reactions
  • Humans
  • Liver Diseases / diagnosis*
  • Liver Diseases / diagnostic imaging
  • Liver Neoplasms / diagnosis
  • Liver Neoplasms / diagnostic imaging
  • Lymphoma / diagnosis
  • Lymphoma / diagnostic imaging
  • Neoplasm Metastasis
  • Neoplasm Recurrence, Local / diagnosis
  • Neoplasm Recurrence, Local / diagnostic imaging
  • Radionuclide Imaging*
  • Technetium
  • Tomography, X-Ray Computed
  • Ultrasonography*

Substances

  • Technetium