Background/aims: An inguinal hernia is a usual medical problem. The golden standard for its treatment is Lichtenstein's repair. But, there are still some dilemmas about inguinal hernia repair technique, including the role of laparoscopy. The aim of this study is to analyze patient's quality of life after Lichtenstein's or laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair.
Methodology: Retrospective analysis of medical documentation of 216 operated patients during the year 2006 at the Department of digestive surgery, University hospital Split, Croatia using tension free mesh repair procedures: Lichtenstein or laparoscopy (TAPP). Among the other data, the analysis includes use of antibiotic prophylaxis and thrombosis prophylaxis. The quality of life analysis was performed using the Short form 36 questionnaire (SF-36).
Results: We operated 212 (98.15%) males and 4 (1.85%) females. The average age of operated patients was 60.15 +/- 13.98 years. The antibiotic prophylaxis was prescribed to 22 (10.19%) patients with some of risk factors for wound infection. We did not register any secondary wound infection. Thrombosis prophylaxis was prescribed to all patients and there were no complications. The quality of life analysis showed no statistically significant differences between Lichtenstein and laparoscopic procedure with slightly better results for laparoscopic procedure in some of the SF-36's domains.
Conclusion: There are no differences in quality of life between the patients operated with Lichtenstein or laparoscopic procedure. Despite that, we believe that laparoscopy has its place for inguinal hernia repair especially for recurrent and bilateral hernias.