Aquatic ecotoxicity tests of some nanomaterials

Environ Toxicol Chem. 2008 Sep;27(9):1942-7. doi: 10.1897/07-509.1.

Abstract

Nanoparticles of TiO2, ZrO2, AL2O3, CeO2, fullerene (C60), single-walled carbon nanotubes, and polymethylmethacrylate were tested for ecotoxic effects using one or more ecotoxicity endpoints: Microtox (bacteria), pulse-amplitude modulation (algae), Chydotox (crustaceans), and Biolog (soil enzymes). No appreciable effects were observed at nominal concentrations of up to 100 mg/L. Dilution of nanoparticle suspensions, either in ultrapure (Milli-Q) water or in natural (pond) water, led to formation of larger particles, which settled easily. (Nano)particles in water were characterized by means of atomic force microscopy, energy-dispersive x-ray analysis, inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry, flow cytometry, and spectrophotometry. It is concluded that the absence of ecotoxicity is the result of low concentrations of free nanoparticles in the tests, and it is suggested that colloid (in)stability is of primary importance in explaining ecotoxic effects of nanoparticles in the natural environment.

MeSH terms

  • Aliivibrio fischeri / drug effects
  • Animals
  • Bacteria / drug effects
  • Chlorophyta / drug effects
  • Cladocera
  • Flow Cytometry
  • Luminescence
  • Mass Spectrometry
  • Microscopy, Atomic Force
  • Nanoparticles / toxicity*
  • Particle Size
  • Soil Microbiology
  • Spectrophotometry, Ultraviolet
  • Toxicity Tests
  • Ultracentrifugation
  • Water Pollutants, Chemical / toxicity*

Substances

  • Water Pollutants, Chemical