Therapeutic optimization of atrioventricular delay in cardiosurgical ICU patients by noninvasive cardiac output measurements versus pulse contour analysis

Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2008 Aug;56(5):269-73. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1038515.

Abstract

Background: Optimizing atrioventricular (AV) delay improves cardiac output and postoperative outcome. Impedance cardiography (ICG) is a non-invasive method for CO measurement. This study evaluates the ability of two ICG methods to determine the optimal AV delay (OAVD) and to compare ICG with invasive PICCO measurements.

Methods: In 14 cardiosurgical ICU patients (age 70.4 +/- 12.0 yrs) with temporary pacing wires, OAVD was determined by pulse contour analysis (PICCO) and ICG (conventional ICG [CI] and electrical velocimetry [EV] ICG monitors). Cardiac output (CO) and stroke volume (SV) were measured during DDD pacing with AVD varying from 70 to 270 ms in 20-ms increments.

Results: Measured OAV showed a linear correlation between PICCO and ICG: CI (r = 0.82, P < 0.0002) and EV (r = 0.84, P < 0.0002). The mean OAVD deviation between PICCO and ICG was 15.7 +/- 21.0 ms (CI) and 17.1 +/- 20.5 ms (EV). Hemodynamic parameters (SV increase OAVD against worst case) improved significantly (+ 11.7 +/- 7.2 %, P < 0.0001).

Conclusion: Inappropriate selection of AVD can compromise the hemodynamic situation of cardiosurgical patients. As it is totally noninvasive, ICG is a reliable and effective tool for tailoring AVD. Both systems (CI and EV) offer valid OAV determination.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Evaluation Study

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Algorithms
  • Atrioventricular Block / physiopathology*
  • Blood Pressure*
  • Cardiac Output*
  • Cardiac Pacing, Artificial*
  • Cardiac Surgical Procedures*
  • Cardiography, Impedance / instrumentation
  • Cardiography, Impedance / methods*
  • Equipment Design
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Intensive Care Units*
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Predictive Value of Tests
  • Reproducibility of Results