Validity of subject self-report for acne

Dermatology. 2008;217(2):164-8. doi: 10.1159/000136655. Epub 2008 Jun 5.

Abstract

Background/objective: Acne prevalence studies often use subject self-report as data source. Our aim was to evaluate the validity of acne self-report.

Methods: Responses of university students to an acne questionnaire were compared to the trained observer's concurrent examination of acne. The validity of self-report was measured by sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value. Agreement was measured by Cohen's kappa and correct classification percentage.

Results: The sensitivity of self-report was 0.55 (95% CI 0.47-0.63), the specificity was 0.72 (95% CI 0.63-0.80), the positive predictive value was 0.70 (95% CI 0.61-0.78), and the negative predictive value was 0.57 (95% CI 0.49-0.65). Cohen's kappa was 0.26 (95% CI 0.15-0.38) and correct classification percentage was 63.

Conclusions: Validity of self-report was moderate at best and agreement was fair, indicating that college students could not accurately report that they have acne. This is likely not sufficient for clinical or research activities or to assure that individuals who self-guide their acne therapy actually have acne.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Validation Study

MeSH terms

  • Acne Vulgaris / diagnosis*
  • Acne Vulgaris / drug therapy
  • Acne Vulgaris / epidemiology*
  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Age Factors
  • Anti-Bacterial Agents / therapeutic use
  • Confidence Intervals
  • Cross-Sectional Studies
  • Dermatologic Agents / therapeutic use
  • Female
  • Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice*
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Prevalence
  • Probability
  • Self Concept*
  • Sensitivity and Specificity
  • Severity of Illness Index
  • Sex Factors
  • Surveys and Questionnaires
  • Treatment Outcome

Substances

  • Anti-Bacterial Agents
  • Dermatologic Agents