Background: The timing of elective surgery of colonic diverticulitis in young patients remains controversial. The present meta-analysis aimed to answer the question whether these patients should be operated after the first attack or, more classically, after the second attack.
Materials and methods: Electronic databases were searched for papers reporting the results of surgery according to the strategies. Major endpoint was the performance of a colostomy (during unplanned surgery or for anastomotic dehiscence complicating elective surgery).
Results: Fifteen papers were selected for potential inclusion in the meta-analysis. But, eventually, only three papers gave information about the timing of surgery. Pooling the data of these 3 studies showed that 160 patients underwent elective surgery after the first attack and only 5 patients underwent subsequent emergent surgery at the course of their disease. Hence, no meta-analysis could be performed.
Conclusion: Researchers should no longer attempt (like us) to answer this question by any meta-analysis. The failure of the present meta-analysis highlights the limitations of evidence-based surgery in some particular fields.