Background: It has been suggested that status as a 'non-dipper' determined from 24-h blood pressure (BP) recordings is associated with increased risk of end-organ damage but little is known about the consistency of dipper status in renal patients. The present post hoc analysis evaluated dipper/non-dipper status prospectively in a study on dosage of enalapril in progressive chronic kidney disease (CKD) stages 3-5.
Methods: In 34 patients, 24-h ambulatory BP (A&D TM2421) was measured at baseline and every 4 months for 1 year or until the need for renal replacement therapy. For each BP recording patients were classified as dippers or non-dippers based on the presence or absence of a nighttime reduction in both systolic and diastolic BP > 10%. Antihypertensive treatment aimed at an office BP < 120/80 mmHg. GFR was measured by the plasma clearance of (51)Cr-EDTA and albuminuria was determined from 24-h collections.
Results: A total of 125 24-h BP recordings were made. Ten patients were constant dippers and five were constant non-dippers throughout the study whereas nineteen patients changed dipping status apparently at random. When analysing pairs of sequential recordings in the individual patient, non-dipper and dipper status remained unaltered in 25 (27%) and 32 (35%) of comparisons, respectively, whereas it was inconsistent in 34 (38%) of cases. No correlation between dipper status and GFR, decline in renal function, degree of albuminuria or BP level could be demonstrated.
Conclusions: The consistency of circadian BP variation seems to be poor in CKD stages 3-5 and single measurements of 24-h ambulatory BP are therefore probably inadequate for the evaluation of dipping status.