For esophageal cancer patients, the gastric tube is the first choice as an esophageal substitute, with the colon or the jejunum being used when the stomach cannot be used. We retrospectively compared these two methods from the viewpoint of peri-operative complications and long-term bodyweight alteration. From 1998 to 2005 53 patients who had undergone subtotal esophagectomy due to thoracic esophageal cancers were given reconstruction with the colon (28 cases) or the jejunum (25 cases). Both intestines were reconstructed via the subcutaneous route and were anastomosed to the internal mammalian artery and vein for a supercharged blood supply. There was no difference in operating time and blood loss. Compared with the colon reconstruction group, the hospital stay of the jejunum reconstruction group was significantly shorter (65 days vs 45 days, P = 0.0120) and the incidence of anastomotic leakage tended to be less (13 cases, 46%vs 6 cases, 24%, P = 0.1507), while other operative morbidity did not differ between the two groups. Bodyweight loss, which is a serious postoperative sequela after esophagectomy, was less in the jejunum group than in the colon group, showing a significant difference at 12 months after surgery. Our retrospective study revealed the jejunum to be superior to the colon for the reconstruction after esophagectomy along with gastrectomy, with respect to anastomotic leakage and bodyweight loss. The next step will be to conduct a prospective large cohort study.