How safe is my intensive care unit? Methods for monitoring and measurement

Curr Opin Crit Care. 2007 Dec;13(6):703-8. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0b013e3282f1bb44.

Abstract

Purpose of review: Patient safety is attracting increasing attention. How we monitor and measure safety, however, is not well defined. In this review we describe a conceptual model for monitoring and measuring safety, describe the development of a safety scorecard, and provide an example of how this scorecard is used in the ICU.

Recent findings: Our safety scorecard stratifies measures into two categories. One category uses valid rate-based measures to evaluate: How often do we provide the interventions that patients should receive? (process measure); and How often do we harm patients? (outcome measure). The second category includes measures that cannot be expressed as valid rates: How do we know we learned from defects? (structural measure); and How well have we created a culture of safety? (context measure). Measures within each domain should be important and valid, and organizations should be able to use the measures to improve patient safety.

Summary: We present a framework for a patient safety scorecard to measure and monitor patient safety. This safety scorecard is a valid and practical tool for ICUs to track progress of efforts to improve patient safety and answer the question, how safe is my ICU?

Publication types

  • Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Critical Illness*
  • Efficiency, Organizational
  • Humans
  • Intensive Care Units / standards*
  • Maryland
  • Monitoring, Physiologic / standards*
  • Organizational Culture
  • Quality of Health Care / standards*
  • Safety Management / standards*