The truth and consequences of the COURAGE trial

J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007 Oct 16;50(16):1598-603. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.07.063. Epub 2007 Sep 17.

Abstract

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has played an integral role in the therapeutic management strategies for patients who present with either acute coronary syndromes or stable angina pectoris. The COURAGE (Clinical Outcomes Utilizing Revascularization and Aggressive Drug Evaluation) trial enrolled patients with chronic stable angina and at least 1 significant (> or =70%) angiographic coronary stenosis who were randomly assigned to an initial treatment of either PCI in conjunction with optimal medical therapy or optimal medical therapy alone. Although the initial management strategy of PCI did not reduce the risk of death, myocardial infarction, or other major cardiovascular events, improvement in angina-free status and a reduction in the requirement for subsequent revascularization was observed. An in-depth analysis of the COURAGE trial design and execution is provided.

MeSH terms

  • Adrenergic beta-Antagonists / therapeutic use
  • Angina, Unstable / therapy*
  • Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary*
  • Aspirin / therapeutic use
  • Coronary Angiography
  • Coronary Stenosis / therapy*
  • Humans
  • Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors
  • Myocardial Ischemia / therapy
  • Patient Compliance
  • Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors / therapeutic use
  • Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic*
  • Retreatment
  • Treatment Outcome

Substances

  • Adrenergic beta-Antagonists
  • Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors
  • Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors
  • Aspirin