Objective: To evaluate the correlation between different therapies and survival of liver metastasis from colorectal cancer ( LMCC) , and to compare the clinical outcome of synchronous liver metastasis (SLM) with that of metachronous liver metastasis (MLM).
Methods: The clinical data of 363 patients with LMCC were retrospectively reviewed with focus on the correlation between different therapy and survival.
Results: Of these 363 patients, 160 had SLM and 203 had MLM. Between the SLM and MLM group, there was no significant difference in age, or gender or primary cancer site (P > 0. 05 ), but significant differences were observed in condition of liver metastasis including liver lobe involved, focus number, maximum focus diameters and level of serum CEA and CA199 before therapy(P <0. 05). Ninety-one patients underwent curative hepatic resection, 22 of them in the SLM group and 69 in the MLM group. Mortality rate related to operation was 4. 5% (1/22) in SLM group and 2. 9% (2/69) in MLM group( P < 0.05). All patients were followed until 31/6/2005. The 3-year survival rate was 5. 2% with a median survival time of 10 +/- 1 months for the SLM group, and it wasl6. 4% and 17 +/- 1 months for the MLM group (P<0.01). Regarding to the treatment modalities, the 3-year survival rate was 30. 2% with a median survival time of 26 months for curative hepatic resection group, and it was 0% - 16. 7% and 10 - 17 months for non-operation groups treated by intervention, chemotherapy, radiofrequency therapy, percutaneous ethanol injection and Chinese traditional drugs (P <0. 05, P <0. 01 ).
Conclusion: Curative hepatic resection is still the first choice for liver metastasis from colorectal cancer improving the survival significantly. Other non-operative methods also can improve phase II resection rate. Metachronous liver metastasis has higher resection rate and better survival than the synchronous liver one.