Linguistic dimensions of weather and climate perception

Int J Biometeorol. 2007 Oct;52(1):57-67. doi: 10.1007/s00484-007-0101-z. Epub 2007 May 17.

Abstract

The purpose of this research was to explore the latent dimensions that underlie people's use of adjectives that can describe weather and climate conditions. A sample of 1,011 university undergraduate students residing the southeastern United States evaluated the weather and climate of that region using 143 English language adjectives. Data were collected over a two-year period during various weather and seasonally related climatic conditions. Polychoric correlations among the adjective ratings were calculated; the matrix of correlations was factor analyzed. Twelve underlying factors related to weather and climate perceptions were observed: 1. threatening, severe, violent, 2. dismal, drab, dark, 3. cold and wintry, 4. hot and summery, 5. tranquil and pleasant, 6. stormy and wet, 7. bright and clear, 8. blowing and blustery, 9. damp and moist, 10. cloudy and cool, 11. predictable and unchanging, and 12. hazy and dusty. A second-order factor analysis revealed two factors pertaining to weather valence: 1. bad or extreme and 2. good or routine conditions. The study results were noteworthy in revealing some of the basic linguistic dimensions along which people perceive and experience weather and climate at the current time in the southeastern United States. The study also represents the use of a new technique for biometeorologists to use in assessing climate perceptions in culturally and climatically diverse regions.

MeSH terms

  • Attitude*
  • Climate*
  • Environment*
  • Georgia
  • Linguistics*
  • Public Opinion*
  • Social Environment
  • Students / statistics & numerical data*
  • Universities / statistics & numerical data
  • Weather*