Relation of isovolumic times after cardiac resynchronization therapy to improvement in exercise capacity

Am J Cardiol. 2007 Jan 1;99(1):75-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2006.07.064. Epub 2006 Nov 9.

Abstract

Isovolumic times (IVTs) comprise a determinant of exercise capacity in cardiomyopathy. We postulated that an increase in exercise capacity after cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) might be related to a more efficient cardiac cycle due to decreasing IVTs and increased filling times. According to standard selection criteria, a CRT device was implanted in 52 patients (37 men; 69 +/- 8 years) with a QRS duration of 174 +/- 30 ms. The etiology was ischemic in 22 and idiopathic in 30 patients. A 6-minute walking test (MWT) and echocardiographic Doppler were performed before and 3 and 6 months after CRT. Timing cycles were obtained with echocardiographic Doppler. An improvement in MWT by >15% (responders) after 6 months of CRT was observed in 46% of patients. The MWT was moderately correlated with baseline time intervals (IVT r = -0.44, filling time r = 0.52), but not to baseline left ventricular ejection fraction (r = -0.06). However, change in the MWT after 3 and 6 months was best related to changes in IVT (r = -0.66 and -0.68, respectively). Receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis of baseline IVT showed that an IVT >29% predicted exercise response with a positive predictive value of 89% and a negative predictive value of 77%. In conclusion, improvement in exercise tolerance after CRT is associated with a decrease in prolonged IVT. Baseline IVT might be used as an adjunctive parameter for selecting symptomatic responders to CRT.

Publication types

  • Evaluation Study
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Cardiac Pacing, Artificial*
  • Cardiomyopathies / diagnostic imaging
  • Cardiomyopathies / physiopathology
  • Cardiomyopathies / therapy*
  • Echocardiography, Doppler
  • Electrocardiography
  • Exercise Tolerance*
  • Heart Conduction System
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Predictive Value of Tests
  • ROC Curve
  • Sensitivity and Specificity
  • Stroke Volume*