[Cardioverter-defibrillator implantation and follow-up in a non-university hospital]

Ann Cardiol Angeiol (Paris). 2006 Nov;55(6):342-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ancard.2006.09.010.
[Article in French]

Abstract

Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD) have emerged as a major treatment for life threatening ventricular arrhythmias. This technique is available in France in all the university hospitals and, with the favor of the new regulation, in some qualified private centers. However, ICD implantation and follow-up in a non-university hospital is infrequent. This study reports long-term results following ICD implantation in 152 patients (age 61+/-13 years). The vast majority (49%) of the patients were implanted for post-infarction ventricular tachycardia and 17% in primary prevention for left ventricular dysfunction. An appropriate therapy was delivered in 83 patients including 68 (81%) treated by antitachycardia pacing without the need for a cardioversion shock. An inappropriate shock was observed in 13 patients (9%). Because of iterative shocks, catheter radiofrequency ablation was proposed among 9 patients, with a success in 8. In conclusion, the technique of the implantable defibrillator can be performed in a non-university hospital with acceptable results. The increase in the ICD number in France implies that there is a need for collaboration between non-university and university hospitals in managing routine and emergency follow-up.

Publication types

  • English Abstract

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Arrhythmias, Cardiac / therapy*
  • Defibrillators, Implantable* / adverse effects
  • Female
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Hospitals, General
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Tachycardia, Ventricular / therapy
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Ventricular Dysfunction, Left / therapy