In many countries, the classification of biosolids for disposal purposes can be based, in part, on fecal coliform levels, with alternative criteria also available based on the stabilization process used, such as anaerobic digestion. The assumption that these alternative criteria provide equivalent protection may be flawed. This paper demonstrates that fecal coliform levels determined after digestion do not always indicate the bacterial levels after the same biosolids have been dewatered by centrifugation. In samples from mesophilic digestion, half had significant increases in coliform numbers (P<0.05) with up to one order of magnitude increase during centrifugation, suggesting coliform regrowth. Thermophilically digested samples had significant increases of several orders of magnitude during dewatering, more likely from reactivation of viable but non-culturable coliforms than from regrowth. In other cases, centrifugation induced coliform regrowth or reactivation upon incubation and storage of dewatered samples, but not digested samples. These 2-3 order of magnitude increases occurred with both 25 and 37 degrees C incubations. Coliform increases continued for up to 5 days, then gradually declined. However, by day 20 coliform numbers were still 2 orders of magnitude greater than when originally sampled. The magnitude of the increases could be due either to regrowth or reactivation, but the nature of the longer-term increases--also seen in biosolids/soil mixtures--suggests regrowth. Differences in numbers between digested and dewatered samples could not be duplicated with high shear processing in lab-scale devices, with nitrogen purging to remove volatile or gaseous constituents, or with redilution using centrate. They could not be attributed to enumeration methods, to interference of Bacillus spp. on apparent coliform counts, or to temperature changes. The increases have practical implications in the use of fecal coliform or alternative criteria to define pathogen content in biosolids.