Walking towards health in a university community: a feasibility study

Prev Med. 2007 Feb;44(2):167-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2006.09.012. Epub 2006 Dec 6.

Abstract

Objective: Using a randomised control trial design, this study assessed the impact of two walking interventions, on the work day step counts and health of UK academic and administrative, university employees.

Method: A convenience sample of 58 women (age 42+/-10 years) and 6 men (age 40+/-11 years) completed baseline and intervention measures for step counts, % body fat, waist circumference and systolic/diastolic blood pressure, during a ten-week period (October to December, 2005). Before intervention, baseline step counts (five working days) were used to randomly allocate participants to a control (maintain normal behaviour, n=22) and two treatment groups ("walking routes", n=21; "walking in tasks", n=21). Intervention effects were evaluated by calculating differences between pre-intervention and intervention data. A one-way ANOVA analysed significant differences between groups.

Results: A significant intervention effect (p<0.002) was found for step counts, with mean differences indicating a decrease in steps for the control group (-767 steps/day) and increases in the "walking routes" (+926 steps/day) and "walking in tasks" (+997 steps/day) groups. Small, non-significant changes were found in % body fat, waist circumference and blood pressure.

Conclusions: Findings have implications for work-based physical activity promotion and the development of walking interventions within the completion of work-based tasks.

Publication types

  • Clinical Trial
  • Randomized Controlled Trial

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Analysis of Variance
  • Feasibility Studies
  • Female
  • Health Behavior
  • Health Promotion / methods*
  • Health Status*
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Motor Activity*
  • Occupational Health*
  • Sex Factors
  • United Kingdom
  • Universities*
  • Walking / physiology*