A test of the tau-dot hypothesis of braking control in the real world

J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2006 Dec;32(6):1479-84. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.32.6.1479.

Abstract

A controlled experiment used instrumented vehicles in a real-world driving task to compare D. N. Lee's (1976) tau-dot hypothesis of braking control with an alternative based on the direct estimation and control of ideal deceleration (T. Yates, M. Harris, & P. Rock, 2004). Drivers braked to stop as closely as possible to a visual target from different starting speeds and times-to-contact. The data provided little support for the tau-dot hypothesis, and analysis suggested that braking in the real world is better explained by a direct deceleration strategy.

Publication types

  • Randomized Controlled Trial
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Acceleration
  • Automobile Driving*
  • Humans
  • Multivariate Analysis
  • Psychomotor Performance*
  • Regression Analysis
  • Space Perception
  • United Kingdom
  • Visual Perception*