Predictors for research involvement among registered dietitians

J Am Diet Assoc. 2006 Dec;106(12):2008-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2006.09.017.

Abstract

Objective: The primary aim of this study was to measure registered dietitians' (RDs') research involvement (by creating a research score) and to determine whether their perceptions, attitudes, and knowledge of evidence-based practice and key antecedent factors (eg, sociodemographic characteristics, education and training, professional experiences, and employment setting) predicted their research involvement.

Design: This cross-sectional, descriptive study used the Dietitian Research Involvement Survey and followed the Tailored Design Method.

Subjects/setting: This study surveyed 258 randomly selected RDs from seven dietetic practice groups of the American Dietetic Association.

Statistical analyses performed: Descriptive statistics, bivariate relationships, and multiple linear regression analyses were conducted to test whether perceptions, attitudes, and knowledge of evidence-based practice score and antecedent factors predicted the research score of dietitians.

Results: Perceptions, attitudes, and knowledge of evidence-based practice score (r = 0.59, P < 0.0005), level of education (r = 0.53, P < 0.0005), taking a research course (r = 0.40, P < 0.0005), last time read research (r = 0.35, P < 0.0005), frequency of professional reading (r = 0.32, P < 0.0005), primary area of practice (r = 0.14, P = 0.02), association memberships (r = 0.14, P = 0.02), and dietetic practice group affiliation (r = 0.14, P = 0.02) were significantly correlated with research score. Using multivariate linear regression, the perceptions, attitudes, and knowledge of evidence-based practice score (beta = 0.48, P < 0.0005) and level of education (beta = 0.39, P < 0.0005) were identified as the strongest predictors of research score.

Conclusions: Involvement in research by RDs is largely determined by their perceptions, attitudes, and knowledge of evidence-based practice and their level of education. Additional education and training related to research methodology and design, and evidence-based practice, is essential for greater participation in research activities by RDs.

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Cross-Sectional Studies
  • Data Collection
  • Dietetics* / education
  • Dietetics* / standards
  • Educational Status*
  • Employment
  • Evidence-Based Medicine
  • Female
  • Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice*
  • Humans
  • Linear Models
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Multivariate Analysis
  • Predictive Value of Tests
  • Professional Competence
  • Research*