Influence of various early human-foal interferences on subsequent human-foal relationship

Dev Psychobiol. 2006 Dec;48(8):712-8. doi: 10.1002/dev.20189.

Abstract

Whereas the way animals perceive human contact has been particularly examined in pet animals, a small amount of investigations has been done in domestic ungulates. It was nevertheless assumed that, as pet animals, non-aggressive forms of tactile contact were as well rewarding or positive for these species, even though the features of intraspecific relationships in pet animals and domestic ungulates may be to some extent different. We test here the hypothesis that horses may not consider physical handling by humans as a positive event. When comparing different early human-foal interactions, we found that early exposure to a motionless human enhanced slightly foals reactions to humans whereas forced stroking or handling in early life did not improve later human-foal relation. Foals that were assisted during their first suckling (e.g., brought to the dam's teat) even tended to avoid human approach at 2 weeks, and physical contact at 1 month of age. We argue that interspecies differences may exist in how tactile stimulation is perceived. It may be important for the establishment of a bond that a young animal is active in the process and able, through its behavioral responses, to help define what is positive for it. This way of investigation may have important general implications in how we consider the development of social relations, both within and between species.

MeSH terms

  • Animal Husbandry / methods
  • Animals
  • Animals, Newborn / psychology*
  • Animals, Suckling / psychology*
  • Behavior, Animal
  • Female
  • Handling, Psychological*
  • Horses / psychology*
  • Humans
  • Mothers / psychology
  • Object Attachment*
  • Species Specificity