Illuminating cancer health disparities using ethnogenetic layering (EL) and phenotype segregation network analysis (PSNA)

J Cancer Educ. 2006 Spring;21(1 Suppl):S69-79. doi: 10.1207/s15430154jce2101s_13.

Abstract

Background: Resolving cancer health disparities continues to befuddle simplistic racial models. The racial groups alluded to in biomedicine, public health, and epidemiology are often profoundly substructured.

Methods: EL and PSNA are computational assisted techniques that focus on microethnic group (MEG) substructure.

Results: Geographical variations in cancer may be due to differences in MEG ancestry or similar environmental exposures to a recognized carcinogen. Examples include breast and prostate cancers in the Chesapeake Bay region and Bight of Biafra biological ancestry, hypertension and stroke in the Carolina Coast region and Central African biological ancestry, and pancreatic cancer in the Mississippi Delta region and dietary/medicinal exposure to safrol from Sassafras albidum.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Cultural Diversity
  • Ethnicity / statistics & numerical data*
  • Genetic Predisposition to Disease
  • Humans
  • Indians, North American / statistics & numerical data
  • Mid-Atlantic Region / epidemiology
  • Mississippi / epidemiology
  • Neoplasms / epidemiology
  • Neoplasms / ethnology*
  • Neoplasms / genetics*
  • Phenotype*
  • Prejudice
  • Racial Groups / statistics & numerical data
  • Southeastern United States / epidemiology