Staging in oesophageal cancer

Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2006;20(5):877-91. doi: 10.1016/j.bpg.2006.05.001.

Abstract

Accurate staging defines groups for stage-specific treatment, minimising inappropriate treatment. Application of dedicated staging methods - including 16-64 multidetector computed tomography (CT), endoscopic ultrasonography with fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) and positron emission tomography (PET) - results in better staging of oesophageal cancer. PET as a metabolic imaging technique that is usually applied after (or recently in combination with) CT (PET/CT) improves the accuracy of non-invasive staging, especially in locally advanced oesophageal cancer patients. Whether EUS-FNA or PET/CT should be performed as a first diagnostic step is still a matter of debate. Fluoro-2-deoxyglucose (FDG) PET is also promising tool in assessing neoadjuvant treatment response. Application of these dedicated staging methods has a learning curve, suggesting a prominent role for centralisation.

Publication types

  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Adenocarcinoma / secondary*
  • Adenocarcinoma / therapy
  • Bone Neoplasms / diagnosis
  • Bone Neoplasms / secondary
  • Endosonography*
  • Esophageal Neoplasms / pathology*
  • Esophageal Neoplasms / therapy
  • Esophagoscopy*
  • Fluorodeoxyglucose F18
  • Humans
  • Liver Neoplasms / diagnosis
  • Liver Neoplasms / secondary
  • Lymphatic Metastasis
  • Neoadjuvant Therapy
  • Neoplasm Staging
  • Positron-Emission Tomography*
  • Radiopharmaceuticals
  • Tomography, X-Ray Computed*

Substances

  • Radiopharmaceuticals
  • Fluorodeoxyglucose F18