Background and aim of the study: There is increasing interest in aortic valve-sparing and repair techniques for the treatment of aortic insufficiency (AI) and/or root aneurysm. The results of bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) repair at the authors' institution were evaluated. An attempt was made to assess the mode of failure and to identify surgical methods that provide durable repair results.
Methods: Aortic valve repair for BAV was performed in 71 patients (62 men, nine women; mean age 41.5 +/- 13.2 years) between 1993 and 2005. Repair techniques included cusp free margin plication (n = 47), subcommissural annuloplasty (n = 27), free margin reinforcement (n = 10), and cusp triangular resection (n = 7). Thirteen patients had remodeling of one or both aortic sinuses, and 16 had reimplantation of the aortic valve. The ascending aorta and arch were replaced in 29 and five patients, respectively. Concomitant mitral and coronary bypass surgeries were performed in 10 and three patients, respectively.
Results: There were no operative deaths. Early postoperative echocardiography revealed no or trace AI in 54 patients and mild AI in 17. There was only one late death which was non-cardiac-related. Eight-year freedom from endocarditis, thromboembolism and anticoagulation-related hemorrhage was 90%, 100% and 100%, respectively. Eight-year freedom from AI grade > or =3+ (moderate) and aortic valve replacement were 44% and 82%, respectively. At the latest follow up, 89% of patients were in NYHA functional class I. Patients who underwent aortic valve-sparing procedures had more stable valve function than those who had cusp repair and subcommissural plication.
Conclusion: BAV repair is a safe procedure with good early functional results. However, recurrent AI remains a problem at five to eight years of follow up. Since dilation of the aortic root is a common cause of AI and a common feature of patients with BAV, aortic valve-sparing reimplantation operations should provide better long-term outcomes.