Comparison of direct-current and radiofrequency ablation of free wall accessory atrioventricular pathways in the Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome

Am J Cardiol. 1992 Aug 1;70(3):321-6. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(92)90612-3.

Abstract

To evaluate and compare the safety and efficacy of catheter-mediated direct-current (DC) or radiofrequency (RF) ablation in patients with free wall accessory atrioventricular pathways, 95 patients with free wall accessory atrioventricular pathway-mediated tachyarrhythmias underwent catheter ablation. Immediately after ablation, 27 of 30 accessory pathways (90%) were ablated successfully with DC, but 2 of the 27 had early return of conduction and received a second ablation session; 3 of 8 (38%) and 57 of 62 (92%) accessory pathways were ablated successfully with RF through a small-tip (2 mm) and a large-tip (4 mm) electrode catheter, respectively. Complications in DC ablation included transient hypotension (2 patients) and pulmonary air-trapping (2 patients) and in RF ablation, cardiac tamponade (1 patient) and suspicious aortic dissection (1 patient); myocardial injury and proarrhythmic effects were more severe in DC ablation. Procedure and radiation exposure time were significantly longer in RF ablation (DC, 3.6 +/- 0.2 hours, 34 +/- 4 minutes; RF 4.2 +/- 0.5 hours, 50 +/- 10 minutes). This study confirms that RF ablation is associated with little morbidity and few complications, and RF ablation with a large-tip electrode catheter is an effective and relatively safe nonsurgical method for treatment of free wall accessory atrioventricular pathway-mediated tachyarrhythmias.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Electrocoagulation / adverse effects
  • Electrocoagulation / methods*
  • Heart Conduction System / abnormalities
  • Heart Conduction System / surgery*
  • Humans
  • Middle Aged
  • Radio Waves
  • Wolff-Parkinson-White Syndrome / surgery*