Influence of fabrication techniques on retention force of fiber-reinforced composite posts

Dent Mater J. 2005 Jun;24(2):280-5. doi: 10.4012/dmj.24.280.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the retention force of FRC posts which were built up using direct and direct-indirect fabrication techniques with two fiber-reinforced core build-up systems (FibreKor and i-TFC). Posts were cemented in endodontically treated bovine single roots with resin cement using either direct or direct-indirect technique. Following which, the retention force of post-and-cores and fracture sites were examined. It was found that both the retention force and fracture site depended on the fabrication technique and resin cements. Post-and-cores built up with direct-indirect technique had greater retention force than those fabricated using direct technique. Fracture modes most frequently observed were adhesive failure at Resin/Dentin interface, a mixture of adhesive failures at Post/Resin and Resin/Dentin interfaces as well as cohesive failure of resin cements. Based on the results of this study, we concluded that when it comes to post-and-core build-up for endodontically treated tooth, the direct-indirect technique is more effective than the direct technique on the retention force of FRC posts.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Analysis of Variance
  • Animals
  • Boron Compounds
  • Cattle
  • Cementation / methods
  • Composite Resins*
  • Dental Bonding / methods*
  • Dental Prosthesis Design / methods*
  • Dental Prosthesis Retention*
  • Dental Stress Analysis
  • Glass
  • Materials Testing
  • Methacrylates
  • Methylmethacrylates
  • Post and Core Technique*
  • Resin Cements
  • Tensile Strength

Substances

  • Boron Compounds
  • Composite Resins
  • FiberKor, sculpture
  • Lute-It
  • Methacrylates
  • Methylmethacrylates
  • Resin Cements
  • fiberglass
  • Super-bond