Comparison of DXA, Siri's 2C, and Lohman' s Db-mineral models for estimating the body fat of physically active adults

Int J Sport Nutr Exerc Metab. 2004 Dec;14(6):657-72. doi: 10.1123/ijsnem.14.6.657.

Abstract

The authors used 3-component (3C) Db-mineral-model (Lohman, 1986) reference measures to cross-validate Siri's (1961) 2-component (2C) conversion formula and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) estimates of relative body fat (%BF) for physically active adults. Participants varied in age (18 to 59 y), body fatness, ethnicity (black, Hispanic, white), and physical activity level. The 3C Db-mineral model was used to obtain reference measures of % BF (%BF3C) for comparison with body-composition measures from DXA and hydrodensitometry. For men (n = 110) and women (n= 110), %BF3C (14.0 % BF and 24.4 % BF, respectively) was more accurately estimated by Siri's 2C formula (% FSiri; men, r = 0.97, SEE = 1.77 % BF; women, r = 0.98, SEE = 1.56 % BF) than by DXA (% FDXA; men, r = 0.86, SEE = 3.54 % BF; women, r =0.88, SEE = 3.73 % BF). The average %BFSiri (men, 15.8 % BF; women, 24.7 % BF) and % FDXA (men, 16.2 % BF; women, 26.0 %BF) differed significantly (P < 0.001) from %BF3C. Siri's 2C model estimated the average % BF3C in this sample more accurately than DXA did.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Absorptiometry, Photon
  • Adipose Tissue / metabolism*
  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Body Composition / physiology*
  • Body Fluids / metabolism*
  • Densitometry
  • Ethnicity
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Minerals / metabolism*
  • Models, Theoretical
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Sensitivity and Specificity
  • Sex Factors

Substances

  • Minerals