Screening for cerebellopontine angle tumors: is a CISS sufficient?

Eur Radiol. 2005 Feb;15(2):286-91. doi: 10.1007/s00330-004-2579-7. Epub 2004 Dec 31.

Abstract

This study attempted to evaluate the reliability of ultra-thin T2-weighted imaging with a constructive interference in steady state (CISS) sequence as a screening method for tumors in the cerebellopontine angle. A retrospective study of 200 CISS examinations was made by five investigators. The examinations were inspected on plain film supported by clinical information. The interobserver agreement in the detection of lesions was analyzed. Fourteen cases (50% of the contrast-enhancing lesions) were rated pathological by all five readers. One case of subarachnoid lymphoma infiltration was overlooked by all five readers. Overall, six pathological lesions (median = 6, range 1-9) were not identified. The interobserver agreement for all pathological lesions was moderate (kappa=0.53; 95% CI, 0.43-0.62). The mean sensitivity was 77.8% (range 72.0-96.3%), and the mean specificity was 97.6% (range 94.8-100%). The median sensitivity for pathological lesions concerning only patients with acute sensorineural hearing loss (n=148, patients with 20 contrast-enhancing cases) was 86.6% (range 80-100%), and median specificity was 95.2% (range 84.4-96.9%) with a moderate interobserver agreement (kappa=0.55; 95% CI, 0.44-0.66). In our opinion the CISS sequence is a valuable addition to the examination of the cerebellopontine angle but lacks sufficient reliability for the detection of tumors of small size or of tumors adjacent to brain parenchyma or the temporal bone.

MeSH terms

  • Cerebellar Neoplasms / pathology*
  • Cerebellopontine Angle / pathology*
  • Contrast Media
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging / methods*
  • Male
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Sensitivity and Specificity

Substances

  • Contrast Media