A comparison of artificial turf

J Trauma. 2004 Dec;57(6):1311-4. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000136154.36483.98.

Abstract

Background: In an attempt to decrease injuries, newer forms of artificial turf have been marketed. The purpose of this study was to determine whether a new shredded rubber-based turf improves impact attenuation.

Methods: An instrumented computerized impact recording device (IRD, Techmark, Lansing, MI) was dropped 20 times from a height of 48 inches onto five types of turf used by a professional football team.

Results: Duncan's multiple range test shows that the new rubber-based field and the older foam field are not significantly different. There were significant differences, however, between sites on the shredded rubber-based field.

Conclusion: The change from a foam-based system to a shredded rubber-based system had no effect on impact attenuation overall. However, areas in the shredded rubber-based field were significantly compacted, causing some sites to be much harder than the foam-based surface it replaced.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Evaluation Study

MeSH terms

  • Acceleration
  • Analysis of Variance
  • Craniocerebral Trauma / prevention & control*
  • Floors and Floorcoverings*
  • Football / injuries*
  • Humans
  • Materials Testing
  • Rubber*

Substances

  • Rubber