Efficacy of distinct energy delivery protocols comparing two biphasic defibrillators for cardiac arrest

Am J Cardiol. 2004 Aug 1;94(3):378-80. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2004.04.042.

Abstract

Limited data have been published on the use of external defibrillators that deliver impedance compensated biphasic (ICB) waveforms in patients. We compared 2 ICB defibrillators, the Heartstream XL (150-150-150 J protocol) and Heartsine Samaritan (100-150-200 J protocol) in 78 consecutive patients in cardiac arrest. The performance of the 2 devices over the first 2 shocks was statistically equivalent. By the third shock, the Heartsine Samaritan had significantly better performance in removing ventricular fibrillation (p = 0.029). Energy selection for ICB waveforms requires further validation.

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation / methods
  • Cohort Studies
  • Electric Countershock / instrumentation*
  • Electric Impedance
  • Equipment Design
  • Equipment Safety
  • Female
  • Heart Arrest / mortality
  • Heart Arrest / therapy*
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Pilot Projects
  • Probability
  • Survival Analysis
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Ventricular Fibrillation / mortality
  • Ventricular Fibrillation / therapy*