[How do we refer to mental health from primary care?]

Aten Primaria. 2003 Nov 30;32(9):524-30. doi: 10.1016/s0212-6567(03)70782-3.
[Article in Spanish]

Abstract

Objectives: To describe referrals from primary care (PC) to mental health (MH) and to study the diagnostic and therapeutic concordance between the two.

Design: Retrospective, descriptive study.

Setting: Gavà II Primary Care Centre, Barcelona.Participants. All patients referred to MH in 1998, 1999 and 2000 (n=380).

Main measurements: The following from the referral form and PC medical records were analysed: general diagnosis, drugs treatment, number of words in the report, and purpose of referral; and on the first visit to MH: general diagnosis and drugs treatment. The kappa index was used to analyse the concordance between the diagnostic and therapeutic groups.

Results: There were 380 referrals, 63.4% of which were women. Information was obtained from the referral form in 81.6% of cases. In 50.7% the reason for referral was for the case to be supervised; and in 12.4% the reason was not recorded. 18.7% (71 cases) did not attend their first MH appointment and waited an average of 78 days (SD=70.9) until the appointment. As 92 cases were lost (71 who did not attend and 21 for whom insufficient information was obtained), only 288 cases were analysed.The greatest diagnostic concordance between PC and MH was in mental deficiency (kappa=0.85) and psychotic disorder (kappa=0.77); and the minimum was in anxiety-depressive disorder (kappa=0.24). The maximum degree of therapeutic concordance was for neuroleptic drugs (kappa=0.66).

Conclusions: The diagnostic and therapeutic concordance between PC and MH is weak. The referral sheet is not present in a great many cases. The waiting-time until the first consultation may explain patient absenteeism.

Objetivo: Describir las derivaciones desde atención primaria (AP) a salud mental (SM) y estudiar la concordancia diagnóstica y terapéutica entre los dos niveles.

Diseño: Estudio descriptivo, retrospectivo.

Emplazamiento: Centro de Asistencia Primaria Gavà II (Barcelona).

Participantes: Todos los pacientes derivados a SM en 1998, 1999 y 2000 (n = 380).

Mediciones Principales: En la hoja de derivación y en la historia clínica de AP se analizó: orientación diagnóstica, tratamiento farmacológico, número de palabras del informe, objetivo de la derivación; en primera visita a SM: orientación diagnóstica y tratamiento farmacológico. Para el análisis de concordancia de los grupos diagnósticos y terapéuticos se utilizó el índice de kappa.

Resultados: Se realizaron 380 derivaciones; en el 63,4% de los casos se trataba de mujeres. En el 81,6% la información se obtuvo del informe de derivación. En el 50,7% el motivo de la derivación era supervisión del caso y en un 12,4% no constaba el motivo. El 18,7% (71 casos) no acude a la primera visita de SM y espera una media de ± DE 78 ± 70,9 días para esta visita. Se perdieron 92 casos (71 que no acudieron y 21 de los que no se obtuvo suficiente información), por lo que únicamente se analizaron 288 casos. La concordancia diagnóstica máxima entre AP y SM es en retraso mental (kappa = 0,85) y trastorno psicótico (kappa = 0,77), y la mínima en trastorno ansiosodepresivo (kappa = 0,24). El grado máximo de concordancia terapéutica es para fármacos neurolépticos (kappa = 0,66).

Conclusiones: La concordancia diagnóstica y terapéutica entre AP y SM es débil. La hoja de derivación no está presente en un elevado número de casos. El tiempo de espera para la primera visita podría explicar el absentismo de los pacientes.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Mental Disorders / diagnosis*
  • Mental Disorders / therapy
  • Mental Health Services / statistics & numerical data*
  • Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care*
  • Primary Health Care / statistics & numerical data*
  • Referral and Consultation / statistics & numerical data*
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Retrospective Studies