Evaluating the efficacy of a thermal exposure chamber designed for assessing workers' thermal hazard

J Occup Health. 2003 May;45(3):153-9. doi: 10.1539/joh.45.153.

Abstract

This study was conducted on a thermal exposure chamber designed for assessing workers' thermal hazard. In order to assess the efficacy of the studied chamber, three environmental conditions were selected to simulate high, middle and low thermal impact situations, with air temperatures (Ta) of 43.12, 36.23 and 25.77 masculine C, globe temperatures (Tg) of 44.41, 41.07 and 29.24 masculine C, relative humidity (RH) of 77, 59 and 39%, and air flow velocities (Va) of 1.70, 0.91 and 0.25 m/s, respectively. For the three specified thermal impact conditions, results show that the coefficients of variation (CVs) for Ta, Tg, RH and Va measured in the chamber studied were consistently less than 10%, except for Va under the low thermal impact condition (=50%). For each specified thermal impact condition, we generated 1,000 environmental combinations by using the Monte Carlo simulation approach according to the variations obtained from the four environmental factors. We directly adopted the ISO 7933 approach to estimate the allowable exposure time (AET) for each simulated environmental condition. This study yielded a range in the 95% confidence interval (95% CI) of the estimated AETs for the three specified thermal impact conditions which were consistently less than 5 min. We further conducted the sensitivity analysis to examine the effect of the four environmental factors on estimating AETs. We found Va was the least important factor in estimating AETs for any specified thermal impact condition. In conclusion, although Va was found with great variation for the chamber specified in the low thermal impact condition, the exposure chamber studied can still be regarded as a feasible one for assessing workers' thermal hazard.

Publication types

  • Evaluation Study
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Environmental Monitoring / instrumentation*
  • Equipment Design
  • Hot Temperature / adverse effects*
  • Humans
  • Monte Carlo Method
  • Occupational Exposure / adverse effects*
  • Protective Clothing