Renal angioplasty and stenting under protection: the way for the future?

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and safety of renal artery angioplasty and stenting utilizing a distal protection device to reduce the risk of intraprocedural artery embolism and avoid deterioration of the renal function. Fifty-six hypertensive patients (32 men; mean age, 66 +/- 11.8 years; range, 22-87) with atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis (8 bilateral) underwent angioplasty and stenting with distal protection in 65 renal arteries (58 ostial lesions). Five patients had a solitary kidney, 18 a renal insufficiency. The lesion was crossed either with a GuardWire temporary occlusion balloon (n = 38), which was inflated to provide parenchyma protection or with a filter (EPI Filter; n = 26), or with Angioguard (n = 1), which allows a continuous flow. Generated debris was aspirated and analyzed. Blood pressure and serum creatinine levels were followed. Immediate technical success was 100%. All lesions except one were stented, either directly (43 ostial lesions) or after predilatation (22 ostial lesions). Visible debris were aspirated with the PercuSurge in all patients or removed with filters in 80% of the patients. Mean particle number and diameter were 98.1 +/- 60.0 per procedure (range, 13-208) and 201.0 +/- 76.0 microm (range, 38-6,206), respectively. Mean renal artery occlusion time was 6.55 +/- 2.46 min (range, 2.29-13.21) with the PercuSurge device. Mean time in situ (filters) was 4.25 +/- 1.12 min. Mean follow-up was 22.6 +/- 17.6 months (range, 1-47). Systolic and diastolic blood pressure declined from 169.0 +/- 15.2 and 104.0 +/- 13.0 mm Hg, respectively, to 149.7 +/- 12.4 and 92.7 +/- 6.7 mm Hg after the procedure. The mean creatinine level remains constant during the follow-up. At 6-month follow-up (45 patients), renal function did not deteriorate in any patient, whereas 8 patients with baseline renal insufficiency improved after the procedure. At 3 years (19 patients), renal function deteriorated only in 1 patient with renal insufficiency and in 1 patient treated for bilateral renal stenosis, one side without protection. These preliminary results suggest the feasibility and safety of distal protection during renal interventions to protect against atheroembolism and to avoid renal function deterioration. This technique's beneficial effects should be evaluated by randomized studies.