An economic viewpoint on alternative strategies for identifying persons with hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer

Genet Med. 2003 Sep-Oct;5(5):353-63. doi: 10.1097/01.GIM.0000086626.03082.B5.

Abstract

Purpose: There is uncertainty regarding the optimal strategy for identifying mutation carriers among those with hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC).

Methods: We used decision analysis to compare the cost-effectiveness of 4 strategies among those with newly diagnosed colon cancer: (1) clinical and family history followed by microsatellite instability testing and germline testing (Bethesda guidelines); (2) universal microsatellite instability testing; (3) germline testing of those who meet clinical and family history criteria; and (4) universal germline testing.

Results: The added cost per year of life saved (YLS) for each strategy was as follows: (1) 11,865 US dollars/YLS, (2) 35,617 US dollars/YLS, (3) 49,702 US dollars/YLS, and (4) 267,548 US dollars/YLS.

Conclusions: The Bethesda guidelines are the most cost-effectiveness approach to screen persons for HNPCC.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.

MeSH terms

  • Colorectal Neoplasms, Hereditary Nonpolyposis / diagnosis*
  • DNA Mutational Analysis / economics
  • Genetic Testing / economics*
  • Humans
  • Microsatellite Repeats