Background: Debate continues regarding the effectiveness of thymectomy in the treatment of nonthymomatous autoimmune myasthenia gravis primarily because there have been no controlled prospective studies. The debate is compounded by the lack of recognition that all thymectomies are not equal in extent or effectiveness and by the fact that all the studies are retrospective without common definitions of myasthenia gravis manifestations or response to therapy. In addition, the analysis of data is often inappropriate.
Review summary: Evidence is presented demonstrating that the extent of the various thymic resectional techniques is very variable and often incomplete and that the more complete the thymic resection the better the results. The indications for thymectomy, the selection of the technique of the resection, the reoperations issue, the perioperative management of the myasthenia gravis patient, morbidity and mortality, and appropriate methods of outcome research are also reviewed.
Conclusion: In view of the impressive results associated with a complete thymic resection in the treatment of myasthenia gravis, patients should not be denied this operation because of lack of prospective proof to-date, and when a thymectomy is performed a total resection is indicated.