A comparison of two models of gynecology service consultation to the emergency department in an academic medical center

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003 May;188(5):1166-8. doi: 10.1067/mob.2003.288.

Abstract

Objective: This study was undertaken to determine differences in resource use and outcomes when emergency department (ED) physicians consult the gynecology service routinely versus selectively.

Study design: In July 2000, an ED policy of "routine" gynecology consultation for pregnant women less than 20 weeks' gestation with pain and/or bleeding complaints changed to a policy of "selective" consultation. Resource use and outcomes were compared for 222 women who received care during the 9 months before the protocol change with 268 women who presented during the 9 months after the protocol change.

Results: With selective consultation, patients receiving gynecology evaluations decreased from 74% to 39%. Return visits to the ED increased from 9% to 21%. Ultrasound studies performed by ED physicians and radiologists increased, whereas studies by gynecologists decreased. Patients waited longer and received more unnecessary human chorionic gonadotropin studies.

Conclusion: A policy of selective gynecology consultation, compared with routine gynecology consultation in the ED, increases diagnostic study resource use and patient length of stay.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Abdominal Pain / diagnosis*
  • Abdominal Pain / diagnostic imaging
  • Academic Medical Centers*
  • Adult
  • Chorionic Gonadotropin / blood
  • Emergency Service, Hospital* / statistics & numerical data
  • Female
  • Gynecology / methods*
  • Humans
  • Length of Stay
  • Pregnancy
  • Pregnancy Complications / diagnosis*
  • Pregnancy Complications / diagnostic imaging
  • Referral and Consultation*
  • Ultrasonography
  • Unnecessary Procedures
  • Uterine Hemorrhage / diagnosis*
  • Uterine Hemorrhage / diagnostic imaging

Substances

  • Chorionic Gonadotropin