Comparative trial of the force required for, and pain of, removing GyneFix versus Gyne-T380S following randomised insertion

J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care. 2003 Apr;29(2):29-31. doi: 10.1783/147118903101197494.

Abstract

Objective: To assess the force required for, and pain of, removal of the GyneFix as compared with T-framed intrauterine devices (IUDs).

Design: A comparative trial following patient-blinded randomisation in an outpatient clinic setting.

Method: Women requesting an IUD for emergency contraception were fitted with either a GyneFix or a Gyne-T380S. For those requesting removal of the IUD, visual analogue scores were used to assess their perception of the associated pain, and a Newton dynamometer was used to measure the force required to remove the device.

Results: Removal required significantly more force for GyneFix as compared with Gyne-T380S (p = 0.004), but there was no significant difference in pain perceived by women during removal. Interestingly, anticipated pain was worse than actual pain experienced.

Conclusion: Although more force is needed to remove the GyneFix as compared with the Gyne-T380S, this does not translate into more pain.

Publication types

  • Clinical Trial
  • Comparative Study
  • Randomized Controlled Trial
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Device Removal / adverse effects*
  • Emergency Treatment / methods
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Intrauterine Devices, Copper* / adverse effects
  • Intrauterine Devices, Copper* / classification
  • London
  • Pain / classification
  • Pain / etiology*
  • Pain Measurement*
  • Patient Acceptance of Health Care
  • Pregnancy
  • State Medicine
  • Torque