[Assessment of pelvic floor dysfunction. Terminology standardization]

Arch Esp Urol. 2002 Nov;55(9):983-8.
[Article in Spanish]

Abstract

Objectives: To record the findings from pelvic floor examination in an understandable way that permits the indication of a proper treatment.

Methods: We review classic classifications, as well as genital prolapse stages and degrees. We also record the POPQ examination system which is the established standard nowadays.

Results: Based on different classifications we intend to set up a systematic examination starting at the anterior segment, following with central and posterior compartments without forgetting pelvic floor descent, anal sphincter and pelvic floor muscles evaluation.

Conclusions: The evaluation of pelvic floor defects is complex, complicating the pathologic diagnosis in order to determine the proper treatment. The various attempts to standardise classifications find problems. Nevertheless, a detailed history, a systematic examination and multidisciplinary cooperation will be able to correct this dysfunction.

Publication types

  • English Abstract
  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Female
  • Humans
  • Pelvic Floor*
  • Terminology as Topic*
  • Uterine Prolapse / classification*
  • Uterine Prolapse / diagnosis*