[Clinical safety and efficacy of single-chamber atrial pacing in sick sinus syndrome: long-term follow-up]

Rev Esp Cardiol. 2002 Dec;55(12):1267-72. doi: 10.1016/s0300-8932(02)76799-7.
[Article in Spanish]

Abstract

Introduction and objectives: Although atrial pacing is a more physiological mode of stimulation in sinus node dysfunction, the pacing modes most often are used DDD and VVI. The aim of our study was to demonstrate that AAI/AAIR pacing is effective and safe by analyzing the complications and mortality of this pacing mode in a long-term follow-up study.

Patients and method: Between 1982 and 2000 definitive AAI-mode pacemakers were implanted for sinus node dysfunction in mode AAI in 160 patients. We analyzed the clinical characteristics, evolution, and complications of the AAI pacing mode during a follow-up of 5.4 4.5 years.

Results: The sample was made up of 104 women and 56 men with an average age of 72 12 years. During follow-up, it was necessary to change the pacing mode for symptomatic bradycardia in 11 patients (annual incidence 1.2%), which was caused by second or third-degree atrioventricular block in 7 patients (annual incidence 0.8%), and chronic atrial fibrillation with bradycardia in 4 patients (annual incidence 0.4%). During follow-up, atrial arrhythmias occurred in 32 patients (annual incidence 3.7%), stroke in 4 patients (annual incidence 0.4%), and 27 patients (annual incidence 3.1%) died.

Conclusions: The AAI/AAIR pacing mode was safe and effective in sinus node dysfunction, with a low percentage of pacing changes required for progression to atrioventricular block, low incidence of atrial arrhythmias, stroke and low mortality during long term follow-up.

Publication types

  • English Abstract

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Cardiac Pacing, Artificial / methods*
  • Electrocardiography
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Pacemaker, Artificial*
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Safety
  • Sick Sinus Syndrome / therapy*
  • Sinoatrial Node / physiology
  • Treatment Outcome