[Dumesnil's method: is it viable?]

Tunis Med. 2001 Nov;79(11):621-7.
[Article in French]

Abstract

Background: Left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF) is an indicator of left ventricular systolic function and is a potent predictor of cardiovascular mortality. LVEF is assessed by a variety of methods, however echocardiography is the most used in clinical practice. Simpson biplane multiple disc method (BMDM) is recommended by the American Society of Echocardiography; Dumesnil's method based on doppler echocardiography seems to be simpler and theoritically less influenced by distortion of LV geometry.

Objective and methods: To assess the accuracy and reproducibility of Dumesnil's method a group of 100 patients proposed for coronarography with left ventricular angiography, prospectively underwent LVEF measurements by both BMDM and Dumesnil's method.

Results: Compared with LV angiography, the correlation coefficient for the Dumesnil's method was r = 0.85 and it was r = 0.9 for BMDM. Correlation in patients with LV regional asynergy were respectively r = 0.69 and r = 0.85. Intraobserver and interobserver variabilities were less then 7% for both echocardiographic methods.

Conclusion: Although Dumesnil's method is less accurate than BMDM, it is simpler, more rapid with a satisfactory reliability and reproducibility.

Publication types

  • Clinical Trial
  • Comparative Study
  • English Abstract

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Coronary Angiography / methods
  • Coronary Angiography / standards
  • Echocardiography, Doppler / methods*
  • Echocardiography, Doppler / standards*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Observer Variation
  • Prospective Studies
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Sensitivity and Specificity
  • Ventricular Dysfunction, Left / diagnosis*
  • Ventricular Dysfunction, Left / pathology