Rat tail suspension is commonly used to mimic human physiology in space. However, energy metabolism adaptation and related autonomic responses are unknown. To give new insights in energy homeostasis, we determined total energy expenditure (TEE) and blood flow redistribution in thermoregulatory organs during suspension using two control groups of animals widely accepted in the literature: the individually housed (isolated) and restraint rats (horizontally attached to the suspension device). Rats (n=33) were randomly assigned during 14-days to three experimental groups: isolated, suspended, or attached. TEE was assessed by a doubly labeled water method throughout the 14 days, and regional blood flow by radiolabeled microsphere procedure at the end of the protocol. Attachment vs. suspension resulted in a significant decrease in TEE (25%), skin (54%), adrenal (55%) and kidney (42%) blood flows, cardiac index (33%), and plasma corticosterone (50%), whereas total peripheral resistances increased (50%). Isolation vs. attachment triggered an inverse response, of similar amplitude, for all above variables. By comparing isolation and suspension, no overall effect was observed. The striking conclusion of this study is that no clear conclusion can be drawn. The choice of the isolated or attached animals as control profoundly influences the outcome results regarding the effects of simulated weightlessness. Further studies are needed but we favor the attached group as the true control since, from a theoretical point of view, a suspended rat is attached plus suspended. In such conditions, TEE decreases to the same extent in rat and humans during simulated microgravity. When reviewing published experiments, we recommend special attention to the control group used rather than on the effects of suspension as compared to an undefined control.