Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate early recovery of systolic function after stentless aortic valve replacement (AVR) versus stented AVR.
Methods: Fifty-four consecutive patients with pure aortic stenosis and impaired left ventricular function (LVEF < or = 35%) were studied retrospectively. Aortic regurgitation, concomitant valvular or coronary artery surgery, atrial fibrillation, and a previous AVR were exclusion criteria. Twenty-two patients (mean age, 70.0 +/- 6.5 years) received a stentless bioprosthesis and 32 (mean age, 58.9 +/- 6.2 years, P =.031 between groups) a mechanical or stented biologic valve. Patients underwent echocardiography preoperatively, at discharge, at 6 months, and at 1 year after surgery.
Results: At 6 months, analysis of variance demonstrated significant differences between groups in fractional shortening measured at the endocardium and midwall fractional shortening (<0.001), velocity of circumferential shortening (P <.001) ejection fraction (P =.02), left ventricular mass index (P <.001), systolic meridional wall stress, and circumferential wall stress (P <.001), One-year studies confirmed these findings.
Conclusion: LV function showed, after a stentless AVR, an early recovery greater than in patients receiving a stented valve.
Copyright 2001 by W.B. Saunders Company