Do we really need routine computed tomographic scanning in the primary evaluation of blunt chest trauma in patients with "normal" chest radiograph?

J Trauma. 2001 Dec;51(6):1173-6. doi: 10.1097/00005373-200112000-00025.

Abstract

Background: A major cause of morbidity and mortality after blunt chest trauma remains undetected injuries. This study evaluates the role of routine computed tomographic (CT) scan.

Methods: We studied 93 consecutive patients from January 1999 to July 2000: 73 (76.3%) after motor vehicle crash with crash speed > 10 mph, and 22 (23.7%) after fall from height > 5 ft. Simultaneous with initial clinical evaluation, anteroposterior chest radiograph and helical chest CT scan were obtained for all patients.

Results: Sixty-eight patients (73.1%) showed at least one pathologic sign on chest radiograph, and 25 patients (26.9%) had normal chest radiograph. In 13 (52.0%) of these 25 patients, the CT scan showed multiple injuries; among these were two aortic lacerations, three pleural effusions, and one pericardial effusion.

Conclusion: Over 50% of patients with normal initial chest radiograph showed multiple injuries on the CT scan, among which were also two (8%) potentially fatal aortic lesions. We therefore recommend primary routine chest CT scan in all patients with major chest trauma.

Publication types

  • Evaluation Study

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Aorta, Thoracic / diagnostic imaging*
  • Aorta, Thoracic / injuries*
  • Diagnostic Tests, Routine
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Predictive Value of Tests
  • Sensitivity and Specificity
  • Thoracic Injuries / diagnostic imaging*
  • Tomography, X-Ray Computed / standards*
  • Wounds, Nonpenetrating / diagnostic imaging*