The potential and limitations of utilising head impact injury models to assess the likelihood of significant head injury in infants after a fall

Forensic Sci Int. 2001 Dec 1;123(2-3):89-106. doi: 10.1016/s0379-0738(01)00523-0.

Abstract

The use of engineering principles in assessing head injury scenarios is of increasing significance in investigations into suspected child abuse. A fall scenario is often given as the history for a head injury to an infant. This paper addresses the basic engineering principles and factors to be considered when calculating the severity of a head impact after free-fall. The application of head injury models (HIMs) to ascertain the forces involved in childhood head injuries from impact is also discussed. Previous studies including Duhaime et al. [J. Neurosurg. 66 (1987) 409] and Nokes et al. [Forensic Sci. Int. 79 (1995) 85] have utilised HIMs for this purpose: this paper reviews those models most widely documented.The HIM currently considered the 'state-of-the-art' is the head injury criterion (HIC) and it is suggested that this model should be utilised for assessing head impact injury in child abuse cases where appropriate.

MeSH terms

  • Acceleration
  • Accidental Falls*
  • Accidents, Traffic
  • Biomechanical Phenomena
  • Child Abuse / diagnosis
  • Craniocerebral Trauma / etiology
  • Craniocerebral Trauma / pathology
  • Craniocerebral Trauma / physiopathology*
  • Humans
  • Infant
  • Models, Biological